Invalidating a us patent

Silverman In considering whether a specific product, apparatus, method or composition of matter may violate a United States patent, primary attention is directed toward the issues of infringement and validity.

Infringement in this context means that the particular technology falls within the patent claims.

One caution – if you send too much, you over inundate the examiner, and then really good art could get overlooked during examination.

Separately, please keep in mind that the claims in a published application have probably not yet even been seen by the examiner at the PTO.

If the USPTO finds the patent to be invalid, then the threat of a patent infringement lawsuit may diminish or even disappear altogether.

Starting in 2012, the USPTO began offering three new proceedings for challenging the validity of already issued U. patents: review, post grant review, and covered business method patent review.

This type of art may have some impact during prosecution of a patent, but if a patent has already been issued, obviousness is a real uphill battle to fight in the courts.Anyone who cares about this patent will surely order up a copy of the application file from the Patent Office, and will come into possession of whatever you sent. Go to and plug in the serial number (for the desired patent).How do you deal with a patent that may cover a product or service that you plan to make, use, sell, or import?Post-grant proceedings are still relatively new, but statistics suggest that they are effective at weeding out bad patents.According to Cooley’s PTAB Digest database, which contains information about every review ever filed, the USPTO has invalidated some or all challenged patent claims in 86% of cases.

Leave a Reply